Thursday, October 25, 2007

4 part blog assignment OCT 29th

Please read Chapters 4 and 5, pp. 57-75, in your purple text The Great White North?Choose two (2) questions from each chapter (provided at the end of each chapter, p. 66 and p. 75). In all four of your responses, be sure to include at least one quote or textual example from the chapter to support your response.


CHAPTER 4

1. How is being White problematic for an instructor who is teaching Aboriginal students?

This entire chapter discusses the way that a White teacher, who is teaching a class entirely of Aboriginal students. The author discusses the ways in which his Whiteness was clearly defined in the class. He speaks about how the way that the classroom was structured at the begining of the class clearly defined the way that White classes are defined and how the teacher stood infront of the class, showing his status above the students. Of course, in the Aboriginal community, everyone, despite the age is respected and defined as equal, sharing knowledge and advice with eachother without any clear definitions of their 'status'. Also, the ways in which the White school systems instruct the class clearly make the curriculum based upon the White European history and content, not giving regards to the views, beliefs and educational practices of other races, such as the Aboriginal people. Another clear distinction made in the chapter was how the White teacher does not understand or know the ways of the Aboriginal people. Many were conflicted with having a White man teach them the European views of the Aboriginals and others, of having a White man teach them in the views of their people. Many races may say that because you are not of their race, "you can't understand" the ways, beliefs, or views of that particular race.

2. Can a White instructor become "culturally sensitive" and, if so, how can cultural sensitivity be practiced in the classroom?

The first thing that stuck me about this question was the referral to 'cultural sensitivity'. To me, this can mean two things, as I have observed two possible meanings to these words. Cultural sensitivity could mean that the teacher, parent, or whoever, tries to understand the beliefs, religion and views of the different culture and attempts not to allow stereotyping or racial indicators influence how they view a particular person or culture. Another meaning is that a person could be so sensitive to this idea of accepting and not labeling, that they try to avoid any sort of reference or comment or thought towards the difference within the two races. They attempt not to say the name of the race, point out differences or say things that may be politically incorrect. This, however, causes more emphasis upon the other race, as both of you become aware that there is differences, but you are uncomfortable discussing it. The other member might become more offended with you trying so hard to avoid an attribute that is not so important, than if you were to accidentally mention an idea or observation.

In the classroom, a teacher must be aware of the different races and cultures that he or she has and become accepting of the difference that are there. The author, Northcott gives many examples as to how he used the differences in his classroom in order to tie them to the curriculum he was teaching. He allowed the Native American race, which was the entire class, learn in the ways that best suited them and their culture. Sitting in circles of communities, rather than in individual desks, having everyone talk, rather than picking on certain students, and being removed from the class at points to allow unbiased and emotional, thoughtful responses from the class. True, a teacher that has many races in the class cannot signal out a specific way to learn, as Northcott did, but he or she had draw on the different learning techniques and allow the student to do what he/she feels comfortable doing for the betterment of learning. A teacher, however, must always remember that he/she is the authority in the class, and must use the differences in moderation and in appropriate situations, but use them nonetheless.

CHAPTER 5

1. Are institutions White?

Being White, born and living in an environment that is highly North American/Westernized, I would have to say, yes. Though the Aboriginal people were here first and we did take much of their land, the world around us is highly White. Schools use European/Western curriculums, drawing on that history rather that those of the other races/cultures. Businesses are driven on money, capital gain, a European/Western view of life. People of different race might be viewed as people who may not be productive in gaining that capital, that drive in order to make money. "When you are raised in the environment and with the ethic of balance and fairness, you are constantly searching for balance and fairness in your life." This is a quote found on page 72 of Lindberg's text. To me, this sticks out because it is true in some respects, businesses are not fair, they are not balanced. There is fighting, arguments, disagreements, lust for gain and there is no shame in stepping over another to achieve that gain. That is a typical understanding of the White industrialized society.

2. How do the histories, employees, and policies of institutions reflect Whiteness and White principles?

As mentioned above, the White community is very much economy driven. We crave money, consumer demands and personal gain. We do not care who we step on, what we distroy or who we hurt when aiming for these goals. The industrial revolution is such an example. Large buildings and factories built upon beautiful green land, women, children and the weak used as workers, labourers in them. No sunlight, no rest, minimum pay and abuse were taken just to gain the little money they were given in hopes that it would be enough to survive another day. Whiteness is so economy driven that we care not about the people we use or the lands we destroy as long as we, the profit makers, get the money, the land, the people and the power. "You will battle every day for balance in your Western workspace."(p. 72) No matter what race, what colour, what culture, if you are living and working in a Westernized society, there will be little fairness, little acceptance and little power given to you by your superiors.

1 comment:

adventures in sex ed (con)texts said...

A thoughtful and intriguing discussion. I don't know if 'cultural sensitivity' that never addresses or listens to or acknowledges difference can really be called cultural sensitivity. I might call it cultural paranoia, or perhaps even as we discussed earlier 'colour blindness'.
A very smart and engaged posting, thank you.
Lisa